The $107 Million Asbestos Verdict Revoked Following Misconduct Discovery
In a significant asbestos case heard in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, a substantial $107 million verdict against Union Carbide Corp., Elementis Chemicals Inc., and E.F. Brady Inc. was overturned due to discovered misconduct involving jurors and the plaintiff's legal representation.
The
lawsuit was initiated by Joel Hernandezcueva, who claimed that his exposure to
asbestos during renovation work at a mixed-use development resulted in his
mesothelioma diagnosis.
This case
underwent a series of legal proceedings, culminating in a trial in 2013 after
Hernandezcueva's passing. While the initial trial outcomes favored the
defendants, Hernandezcueva's family successfully appealed, leading to a new
two-phase trial held in the summer of 2023.
The $107 Million Asbestos Verdict Revoked Following Misconduct Discovery
This trial concluded with a substantial award of $32 million in compensatory damages and $75 million in punitive damages in favor of the plaintiffs.
However,
following this verdict, the defendants filed a joint motion, contesting the
excessive damages and alleging juror misconduct.
The motion
brought forward troubling testimonies from jurors detailing misconduct within
the jury deliberations.
This
included claims of a non-compliant "quotient verdict" method being
applied and the concealment of information by a juror during voir dire, which
significantly impacted the trial process.
Plaintiffs
conceded to the jurors' conduct but argued that it did not unduly prejudice the
final verdict. Nonetheless, the court found instances of misconduct by jurors
and the plaintiff's legal representation.
This
encompassed disregarding vital evidence, making inflammatory arguments, and
introducing causation testimony blocked by pretrial rulings.
Moreover,
the court noted a lack of substantial evidence linking the defendants' products
directly to Hernandezcueva's mesothelioma. Critical aspects of the evidence
presented at trial failed to establish clear causation between the products and
the diagnosis. The defendants argued that the evidence left the jury to
speculate about the specific asbestos-containing compounds used, leading to an
insufficient foundation for the verdict.
Additionally,
the court scrutinized the awarded damages, especially the punitive damages,
deeming them excessive. The court highlighted that the survival claim belonged
to Hernandezcueva's wife, not his children, indicating an error in the
allocation of damages. The court expressed concerns over the extraordinarily
high punitive damages, stating there was no substantial evidence to justify
such an astronomical amount.
Consequently,
the court granted the defendants' motion for judgment notwithstanding the
verdict, effectively overturning the entire verdict. This decision is subject
to potential further legal proceedings, and the Asbestos Case Tracker will
monitor any subsequent appeals filed by the plaintiffs in the California Court
of Appeals.
Source: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/107-million-asbestos-verdict-set-aside-7810121/
Comments
Post a Comment